Skip to content

The Rape of America – Supported by Your Local Judiciary

Because the affidavits were false, the judge ruled that the company’s collection process was not legal. This is the common practice across the whole debt collection industry. Hundreds, if not thousands, of these boilerplate affidavits are generated each day. “every credit card judgment is void”

A ruling in a class-action lawsuit in Ohio casts serious doubts about affidavits being used all over the country to support debt buyer collection lawsuits. A U.S. District Court Judge ruled that the commonly used affidavit submitted by one of the nation’s biggest debt collectors was not legal.

The District Court Judge issued an injunction against the company, creating doubt about collection lawsuits across the nation that used the same affidavits in support of debt collection suits. In his ruling, debt collectors, as a practice, signed affidavits stating that the individual clerk had “personal knowledge” of the debt being collected when they did not possess any such knowledge.

Because the affidavits were false, the judge ruled that the company’s collection process was not legal. “It is unclear to this court why such a patently false affidavit would be the standard form used at a business that specialized in the legal ramifications of debt collection.” This is the common practice across the whole debt collection industry.

Hundreds, if not thousands, of these boilerplate affidavits are generated each day, and I have strong doubts about whether the people signing them have “personal knowledge” about all, or any, of the accounts. Yet courts across the country continue to accept the testimony in these questionable affidavits as gospel.

In other words, NOT every judgment is a valid judgment and, in fact, when it comes to credit card debt and other unsecured debt, virtually every judgment is void. In nearly every debt collection lawsuit the individual clerk who signed the affidavit does not have first-hand knowledge and therefore is not a competent witness and the affidavit submitted is false, therefore every credit card judgment is void.

This is also the reason that debt collection lawsuit never go to trial but will always end up in a quick judgment against the debtor? The debt collector would need a competent fact witness to testify, someone with first-hand knowledge. There’s no such thing as evidence without a competent fact witness. The individual clerk who signed the affidavit does not qualify as a competent witness.

Ohio Government Oppression: Attorney General Mike DeWine

The Ohio Government deprives me of my personal property without due process, costing me hundreds of thousands over a period of sixteen years just trying to gain possession of my own property that was illegally acquired under the corrupted authority of the Ohio Government.

Sent to: Mike DeWine (Ohio Attorney General); Director Michael Murry (Constituent Services)
Cc: Chief Marcia Macon-Bruce (Collections Enforcement)

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine
30 E. Broad St., 14th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215

Dear Attorney General Mike DeWine; Director Michael Murry (Constituent Services),

Did you find out who is the competent authority for the protection of citizen’s civil rights. This is a subject that has always been eluded; whenever I mention words like “civil rights, civil liberties, human rights, alienable rights, legal rights, Constitutional rights, 14th Amendment, etc.” public servants generally stop replying to my e-mails.

The Federal Constitution is the superior law of the land and government is a servant to the Constitution and “We the People”. The three branches of government were formed as a means of checks and balances to prevent any branch of government from becoming more powerful than the other. Without these checks and balances there is oppression and tyranny.

This is where we are at today; the three branch of government are self-policed instead of policing one another. When one branch violates citizens civil rights, the other two turn a blind eye… In turn, this government breakdown has created a very serious problem; i.e. The Executive Branch cracks down on innocent citizens for issues that was no fault of their own, but victims of the Judicial Branch. Now these citizens have become victims of both branches; first, by the mayhem in the Judicial Branch for gross lack of superintendent, in turn, destroying innocent citizens lives; Second, by the Executive Branch do to the failure of keeping the Judicial Branch in check.

The Ohio Government (Executive Branch) wants me to pay money I owe to the Department of Natural Resources, that I cannot pay because of corruption in the Ohio Government (Judicial Branch). […]

Let me just simplify this a little bit: The Ohio Government deprives me of my personal property without due process, costing me hundreds of thousands over a period of sixteen years just trying to gain possession of my own property that was illegally acquired under the corrupted authority of the Ohio Government; The Ohio Government deprives me of my rights under the Federal Constitution, 14th Amendment “Due Process of the Law, Equal Protection of the Law, and Redress of Grievances”; The Ohio Government deprives me of my rights under the Ohio Constitution “…enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and seeking and obtaining happiness and safety.”; The Ohio Government deprives me of my legal rights “Laws of the United States”; And now, the Ohio Government threatens me, that if I don’t pay the $879.69 for dam inspection fees within 10 days, they will charge me interest, fees, penalties, leans, attachments, foreclosures, garnishments, and sheriff’s sales.

The Ohio Government tells me “This is your problem, we can’t help you…”.

If I was to publish an example of Ohio Government Oppression, “this would be it”.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

FEATURED ARTICLE

FBI Files (Conspiracy Against Rights) Part 1

In reviewing both FBI documents and Warren County, Ohio Court documents

Besides the $150,000 of personal assets embezzled by Judicial Officers under “Arbitrary Power”, there appeared to be nearly a $100,000 embezzled from the estate that Administrator/Chief Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap had control of as well. If a Federal Criminal Investigation was opened and investigated properly; the exposure of the embezzled quarter million and who received the money would be exposed, along with the double-dipping and other tortious acts. […]

Read entire article: FBI Files (Conspiracy Against Rights) Part 1 »

Treason, Misprision of Treason (Conspiracy Against Rights)

Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. | Misprision of treason, is the concealment of treason, by being merely passive; for if any assistance be given, to the traitor, it makes the party a principal, as there is no accessories in treason.

Sent to: Edward J. Hanko (Cincinnati – Special Agent in Charge)

Edward J. Hanko
Special Agent in Charge
John Weld Peck Federal Building
550 Main Street, Suite 9000
Cincinnati, OH 45202

Re: Federal Civil Rights Statutes; Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law and Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241, Conspiracy Against Rights.

Dear Special Agent Hanko,

I am writing this letter in regards to the Deprivation of Rights protected under the Constitution and laws of the United States.

Branches, Agencies, Jurisdiction, Authority, and Officers of the of the State of Ohio Government (hereinafter called the “State Government”)

Branches, Agencies, Jurisdiction, Authority, and Officers of the of the United States Government (hereinafter called the “Federal Government”)

EVERYONE, who is sworn to the Constitution, regardless of rank, position, title, or office, has the obligation to take every action within their power and capability to restore our Constitution to its rightful status for a FREE people – lest they themselves be charged with Obstruction of Justice, or as co-conspirators in the act of Treason.

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.”. Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Ohio, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below). If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.

Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

Misprision of treason, is the concealment of treason, by being merely passive; Act of Congress of April 30, 1790, 1 Story’s L. U. S. 83; 1 East, P. C. 139; for if any assistance be given, to the traitor, it makes the party a principal, as there is no accessories in treason.

Director Robert S. Mueller III quoted on the importance of protecting “all Americans” of their individual civil rights and civil liberties.

Director Mueller quoted: “Protecting the civil rights of all Americans is one of the FBI’s highest missions, whether the violations occurred four days ago or 40 years ago.”

On August 4th 2005 he had quoted: “We have learned many lessons since then. One of the most important of these is that it is our mission to protect the civil liberties of all Americans. Because when just one of us loses just one of our rights, then the freedoms of all of us are diminished.”

On November 4th 2011 he had quoted: “Every FBI employee takes an oath promising to uphold the rule of law and the United States Constitution—the same oath that I and each of you have taken.”

”It is not a question of conflict; it is a question of balance. The rule of law, civil liberties, and civil rights—these are not our burdens. These are what make all of us safer and stronger.”

President Kennedy delivered a televised address. He said, and I quote,
“Our nation is founded on the principle that the observance of the law is the eternal safeguard of liberty, and defiance of the law is the surest road to tyranny.”

“The notion that no man is above the law –and in the words of Teddy Roosevelt, that “no man is below it”—is the only true protection we have against the specter of oppression and undue influence.”

“In the end, we in the FBI know that we will be judged not only by our ability to keep Americans safe from crime and terrorism, but also by whether we safeguard the liberties for which we are fighting and maintain the trust of the American people.”

In the last 15 years, I have lost hundreds of rights protect under the Constitution of the United States and State of Ohio. The State and Federal Governments has not protected my rights, freedoms, and liberties.

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, § 1:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Ohio Constitution, § 1.01 Inalienable Rights (1851):

“All men are, by nature, free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and seeking and obtaining happiness and safety.”

We would just like to live the American Dream protected under the Constitution that our forefathers have given us; unfortunately, it would require a functional government in order to defend, enjoy, and protect our liberties, freedoms, property, obtain happiness, and safety.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

Government Abuse (Deprivation of Human Rights – Torture)

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and deprived my rights protect under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Constitution of the United States.

Sent to: Edward J. Hanko (Cincinnati – Special Agent in Charge)
Cc: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI); Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Special Agent Edward Hanko,

On August 3, 2011, I filed a complaint with the DOJ Criminal Division, Chief Teresa McHenery on “GOVERNMENT ABUSE, DEPRIVATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, TORTURE (U.S.C. TITLE 18, § 2340) (ARTICLE 3 & 5 UDHR)”. This is the same complaint that I am now filing with you, (see attached document: COMPLAINT-Government Abuse_Edward-Hanko_111116.pdf).

After more than five weeks and no response, on September 14, 2011, I sent Chief Teresa McHenery a follow up letter, (see attached document: Chief Teresa McHenry_110914.pdf).

On September 23, 2011, Chief Teresa McHerery replied to the complaint that I filed on August 3, 2011, (see attached document: DOJ-Crinimal-Div_Tereasa-McHenry_reply.pdf)

As you can see; the response from the Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section had stated that they only prosecute Federal Criminal Violations including Torture when they are committed outside the United States. To file a complaint to investigate within the borders of the United States I would need to file this complaint with my local FBI Office (along with the contact information).

Due to government abuse, I have spent several days in the hospital, sent to the ER for what was believe to be a heart attack, and now disabled and unable to work, all to cover-up the theft of a quarter million by judicial officers.

Please see that this complaint is properly, responsibility, competently, and diligently addressed.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

Attached file: COMPLAINT-Government Abuse_Edward-Hanko_111116p;  Chief Teresa McHenry_110914;  DOJ-Crinimal-Div_Tereasa-McHenry_reply

Cover-up by State and Federal Public Officials (Sweep this Case Under the Rug)

This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States.

Sent to: Edward J. Hanko (Cincinnati – Special Agent in Charge)
Cc: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI); Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Special Agent Hanko,

Please find attached document (COMPLAINT_18usc-2_Edward-J-Hanko_111115.pdf)

This is part two of the original complaint, I kept the two separate so that they would not be so confusing. You have probably figured it out by now that there are several State and Federal public officials who would like to sweep this case under the rug. The case involves crimes committed under Federal Civil Rights Statutes. I am just fighting for my right protected under the Constitution and Laws of the United States of which I have been deprived.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

Attached file: COMPLAINT_18usc-2_Edward-J-Hanko_111115p

Judicial Corruption Investigations (Organized Crime and Political Corruption)

This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.

Sent to: Edward J. Hanko (Cincinnati – Special Agent in Charge)

Dear Special Agent Hanko,

Please find attached document (COMPLAINT_18usc-1_Edward-J-Hanko_111114.pdf)

With your past experience in organized crime, and political corruption investigations, this case should be right down your alley. Please see that this case is properly investigated, unfortunately, the political corruption and cover-ups is what makes this case so difficult.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

Attached file: COMPLAINT_18usc-1_Edward-J-Hanko_111114p

Affidavit (Lawyers Conspericy to Embezzle $150,000 by Conversion)

Criminal Judges, deprivation of natural and legal rights. The conspiracy and their plan on how they tried to embezzle the $150,000 of personal assets during the Guardianship Period.

Sent to: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)
Cc: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)

Dear Mr. Perkins,

On August 22, 2011, you had responded to a letter I sent to Director Mueller regarding violations under “Federal Civil Rights Statutes; Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law and Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241, Conspiracy Against Rights”

In your letter you had stated “The seizing of property is a lawful action performed by law enforcement and has recourse to allow for seized property to be returned to the original owner”.

I had then replied to Director Mueller, stating;

“I have no clue where Assistant Director Kevin Perkins got his information, but he must have this case mixed up with some other case or someone in the DOJ just made this all up; in either case it does not apply to the Federal Civil Rights Statutes complaint which I filed. There was never any seized property. There was never any law enforcement officers involved. The property could never be returned though lawful recourse because it had never been seized in the first place. In no document at anytime had I ever mentioned the word “seized”. It really doesn’t make any sense at all on why Mr. Perkins had stated this in his letter.”

To further clear the matter up I have attached the first draft of an Affidavit that I am working on for upcoming legal issues as a result of the fifteen years of judicial corruption. I only have the about a quarter of the first draft almost completed, I excepted to be over a hundred pages by the time I have completed it. This is the section that explains the conspiracy and their plan on how they tried to embezzle the $150,000 of personal assets during the Guardianship Period. After that I suppose it was all damage control; fifteen years of damage control.

I thought you would like to have the facts to this case, and that the fairytale that my personal assets was seized is just that, a fairytale. The next section is the best part; that part shows how lawyers and Probate Judges embezzle money out of estates…

I will keep sending you facts as I complete the Affidavit so that we can this mess cleaned up and recover my entitlements. Everyone else is afraid to get involved in this case; but, the law is the law, and by law no one has a right to deprive me of my natural and legal rights, not even criminal judges… especially criminal judges.

This is what our Constitution and Federal Government is for; to protect us citizens from government oppression and tyranny.

Did you know, according to FBI records, the first time that I reported these criminal acts was almost three and half years ago?

Whatever happened to the rule of law…

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

 AFFIDAVIT Lilley_111103_first draft

Victim of Color of Law Abuse (Victim Notification System)

As a victim of Color of Law Abuse; I would like to register for the Victim Notification System (VNS). To do this I will require a VIN and PIN. I would like to exercise my crime victim’s rights under title 18 United States Code § 3771.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

As a victim of Color of Law Abuse; I would like to register for the Victim Notification System (VNS). To do this I will require a VIN and PIN.

Please have my victims specialist contact me as I would like to exercise my crime victim’s rights under title 18 United States Code § 3771.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

Registration:
You will receive a Victim Identification Number (VIN) and a Personal Identification Number (PIN) that will allow you to access VNS on the Internet and using your telephone. If you have chosen to participate in VNS, but have not received these numbers, please contact either the FBI, the USPIS, or U.S. Attorney’s office handling your case. Your VIN and PIN numbers are both required any time you contact the Call Center or when accessing VNS on the Internet.

Trial by Jury (Jury May Have Awarded Excess of Twenty Million)

Deprived of my natural and legal rights to due process, equality under the law, and trial by jury; with fifteen years of fraud, corruption, cover-ups, deceit, conspiracies, scams, and abuse; a jury may have easily awarded an excess of twenty million.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

On the documents I send you yesterday, (see attached: ENTILTED RELIEF FROM COMPLAINTS.pdf)

If these cases were allowed to go to trial as my protected rights under the Constitution and Laws of the United States, and if I was not deprived of my natural and legal rights to due process, equality under the law, and trial by jury; with fifteen years of fraud, corruption, cover-ups, deceit, conspiracies, scams, and abuse; a jury may have easily awarded an excess of twenty million.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

ENTILTED RELIEF FROM COMPLAINTS

%d bloggers like this: