Skip to content

Entilted Relief from Complaints / FBI Special Agents Opinion…

Out of nearly a dozen FBI Special Agents that I spoke with on addressing these issues, four had expressed their opinion that this was a case of Public Corruption.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

Please read attached document (ENTILTED RELIEF FROM COMPLAINTS.pdf).

Out of the nearly quarter million dollars the Co-administrators (Dunlap and Hedges) stole were not all probate assets, $150,000 were non-probate assets. $100,000 was the personal property of Stephen Lilley and $50,000 was the personal property of Christopher Lilley. Christopher died seven years after his money was stolen, never to receive it.

It has never been determined on the exact whereabouts of the stolen quarter million. Dunlap, Hedges, and Powell circumvented statutory laws ORC 2109.32 “Hearing on fiduciary’s account” and 2115.16 “Hearing on inventory”. The heir of the estate, Stephen R. Lilley was never allowed to review the fiduciaries accountings. Dunlap also refused to comply with Federal Law (U.S.C. Rule 34) “Production of Documents and Things”; again, the Plaintiff Stephen R. Lilley was not allowed to review the fiduciaries accountings. These are both violations under 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law and 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy against Rights.

Although the Co-administrators, Court of Appeals, and two other judges confirmed that the $150,000 of non-probate assets were comingled with the probate assets, the fiduciaries did not disclose the non-probate assets in their inventory. Dunlap had fabricated both federal and state documents in order to conceal the true identity of ownership in violation of federal and state statutory laws.

Out of nearly a dozen FBI Special Agents that I spoke with on addressing these issues, four had expressed their opinion that this was a case of Public Corruption.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

 ENTILTED RELIEF FROM COMPLAINTS

Advertisements

UPDATE… (Quarter Million Personal Property Embezzled by Judicial Officers)

Violations under Federal Civil Rights Statutes, the quarter million dollars of personal property embezzled by judicial officers, and my entitlements from the four lawsuits I filed and the Sham Legal Process.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

As you may recall, on October 14, 2011, Assistant Director Kevin L. Perkins responded to a letter that I had send you earlier, stating, “The FBI’s investigative jurisdiction, as it relates to Color of Law matters, applies to any individual action under his/her authority granted by the federal, state or local government, and when such acts are done outside the boundaries of the person’s lawful authority.” I had then sent you the complaint (part 1 and 2) that relates to Color of Law matters that Mr. Perking was referring to (see attached documents: COMPLAINT_18usc-1_Robert-S-Mueller_111021.pdf and COMPLAINT_18usc-2_Robert-S-Mueller_111021.pdf).

This case is in reference to “violations under Federal Civil Rights Statutes, the quarter million dollars of personal property embezzled by judicial officers, and my entitlements from the four lawsuits I filed and the Sham Legal Process”

I am supposed to meet with the bank manager this week and give her an update of the recovery of my personal property of entitlement from the four lawsuits and the Sham Legal Process. I had expected to pay this off several months ago but due to political issues and cover-ups I did not receive my personal property as entitled by law and the loan did not get paid off as planned.

I have not received any updates since Mr. Perkin’s correspondence dated 10/14/2011. I have been forwarding you documents on nearly a daily basis to assist in the FBI Color of Law investigation. If you need additional documents please don’t hesitate to ask. If I don’t have them in my possession I may be able to get a hold of them.

Please fill me in on the progress and let me know when you expect to recover my personal entitlements so I can forward the info to the bank manager.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

COMPLAINT_18usc-1_Robert-S-Mueller_111021p; COMPLAINT_18usc-2_Robert-S-Mueller_111021p

Special Agent in Charge (Federal Government Responsibility) Individual Civil Rights

More than fifteen years ago with the embezzlement of my personal property involving Ohio State Government Judicial Officers followed by more than fifteen years of fraud and deceit and still being carried on to this very day.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

I hate to keep bothering you, but this case started more than fifteen years ago with the embezzlement of my personal property involving Ohio State Government Judicial Officers followed by more than fifteen years of fraud and deceit and still being carried on to this very day. I had to deal with more trickery, cover-ups, and deceit yesterday. Keeping the government in check should not be my job.

I don’t think you are planning on taking care of this case personally; although, protecting the civil rights of all Americans is one of the FBI’s highest missions, but you really need to hand this case over to a civil rights specialist. The very first mission to be addressed in this case should be protect my individual “Civil Rights”; my inalienable and legal rights have been violated on a daily basis and protecting these rights is a Federal Government responsibility.

Please see that the Special Agent in Charge of this Color of Law Abuse case gets in touch with me as soon as possible. At least we can restore my civil rights and freedoms that all Americans are entitled without further delay. The Public Corruption, and RICO and other criminal acts can be dealt with later.

The best way to get in touch with me is by e-mail:

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

Grievances (Judge Michael E. Powell, Magistrate Brenda N. Dunlap)

These two grievances were not the only ones that were covered-up and swept under the rug. I had filed about 80 grievances altogether over the last dozen years or so and everyone of them were swept under the rug.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

Attached to the e-mail are a couple of grievances that you may be interested in. (see documents: Grievance_Judge Powell.pdf and Grievance_Judge Dunlap.pdf)

The two grievances were filed on August 6, 2007 with case number given to them from the “OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO” as: Judge Michael Powell, ODC File No. A6-2753J and Magistrate Brenda Dunlap, ODC File No. A7-2580J.

I had never received a reply on the two grievances as the case numbers were removed from my file and they were swept under the rug. We have a lot of people in all levels of government who wish to deprive me of the Civil Rights. These two grievances were not the only ones that were covered-up and swept under the rug. I had filed about 80 grievances altogether over the last dozen years or so and everyone of them were swept under the rug. According to statists, less than 2% of grievances ever make it to a hearing and that does not include the ones that were previously purged from the system like 80 grievances I had filed.

These Judicial Officers had embezzled about a quarter million that we know of. About another quarter million were paid out as legal fees trying the recover the quarter million that they had stolen. We have estimated my loss in total damages was well in to sever figures.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

 Grievance_Judge Powell; Grievance_Judge Dunlap

Monday Deadline (Letter of Investigation – Color of Law Abuse)

By filing a motion to stay with the letter of investigation from you would be the first step to reversing the damages inflicted by Judicial Officers due to Color of Law Abuse. There are over 200,000 Warren County citizens counting on us to clean up the problem.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

Below is the e-mail conversion between my attorney and myself from this morning. We are trying to clean up this mess the best way we can with limited assistance. Fifteen years of judicial corruption can cause a lot of damage and it just does not seem to stop. By filing a motion to stay with the letter of investigation from you would be the first step to reversing the damages inflicted by Judicial Officers due to Color of Law Abuse.

As my attorney has stated, the deadline is Monday October 31 to file the motion. It is in your hands now, nothing else I can do at this stage of the game, there are over 200,000 Warren County citizens counting on us to clean up the problem.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

Denis,

I am already on it, yesterday I sent the following e-mail to FBI Director Robert Mueller and Assistant Director Kevin Perkins. I only have two options that I can think of at this time. If I don’t receive a letter from the FBI to stay pending investigation in time and the judge sustains the summary judgment; I will have to go ahead with plain “B”.

I will forward your e-email to Washington, as far as I know, Director Mueller is the only person who has authorization that can authorize this letter.

Doing the best I can under the circumstances. I am entitled to the money to settle this and other claims, it just needs to be recovered.

Thanks,
Steve

Victim of Judicial Corruption (Federal Civil Rights Crime) Color of Law Abuse

When a citizen becomes a victim of judicial corruption, the victim no longer has protection under judicial authority, he/she then becomes open season by all unscrupulous lawyers and judges.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

We are trying to address the issue of government victimization once again. When a citizen becomes a victim of judicial corruption, the victim no longer has protection under judicial authority, he/she then becomes open season by all unscrupulous lawyers and judges.

Yesterday I had informed you that another criminal act is about to be committed, stating; “I have also been given information that another Federal Civil Rights Crime is about to be committed against me sometime next week. This criminal act also involves “Federal Civil Rights Statutes; Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law and Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241, Conspiracy Against Rights” in a direct spinoff from the case we are dealing with now.”

The simplest way to prevent this and other criminal acts from being committed and to put this case in check would be to file a motion to stay. To do this I would need a letter from you or the “Special Agent in Charge” of this case with the case number and the letter stating that all legal proceedings are to be stayed pending FBI investigation. I could then have my bankruptcy attorney file the motion along with the FBI letter.

I could also use this letter to give to my mortgage company next month to explain why I am not able to make my monthly mortgage payment and that it will be paid off once the FBI has recovered the belongings that I am legally entitled.

You can e-mail the letter to this e-mail address so that my attorney can file it Monday morning to prevent from any further harm to my wellbeing.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

Civil Rights Lawsuit – Kangaroo Court (Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Proceedings)

Even though I had a lawsuit pending in Federal Court, Judge Sunderland had no reservations about infringing on Federal Laws and had planned on holding his Kangaroo Court anyway… continue under Arbitrary Jurisdiction and not under the jurisdiction of the Federal Constitution.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

In an attempt to gain equality under the law I had filed a Civil Right Lawsuit in Federal Court. According to my research; A lawyer will never file a Civil Rights Lawsuit against a Judge and If a filed pro se, it will be dismissed on a technicality. With about a 1 in 10,000 chance that it would go through, I thought I would give it a whirl anyway.

The purpose of the Federal Lawsuit was to try to have the case moved to Federal Jurisdiction and out of the Warren County Sham Legal Process. Even though I had a lawsuit pending in Federal Court, Judge Sunderland had no reservations about infringing on Federal Laws and had planned on holding his Kangaroo Court anyway. That brought forth the need to file the “PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY IN STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS AND RESTRAINING ORDER”, to stop judge Sunderland’s chaotic behavior. (See attached document: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS_100419_2.pdf)

When a Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit is filed against the presiding Judge that is in violation of Civil Right Law, by law, the Civil Case that the judge is presiding over is STAYED until the Federal Complaint can be heard and a decision by the Federal Judge and a Motion to Stay is not required. This did not seem to make any difference to Judge Sunderland; he was determined to continue on under Arbitrary Jurisdiction and not under the jurisdiction of the Federal Constitution.

Federal Judges do not like to get involved with other judges and will claim a technicality just to get out of the case. The Federal Judge dismissed the motion on a technicality claiming the Pro se litigant failed to cite an ordinance number. Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedures 8(f), a Pro se litigant’s Motion cannot be dismissed on the technicality because he did not hold the same standards as a lawyer.

“The plaintiff, a Pro se litigant, in pursuit of what is defined in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures 8(f) as substantial justice, takes steps to make the Court aware of the following:
The courts provide pro se parties wide latitude when construing their pleadings and papers. When interpreting pro se papers, the Court should use common sense to determine what relief the party desires.”

“Pro se litigants’ Court submissions are to be construed liberally and held to less stringent standards that submissions of lawyers. If the court can reasonably read the submission, it should do so despite failure to cite proper legal authority, confusion of legal theories, poor syntax and sentence construction, or litigant’s unfamiliarity with rule requirements.”

This would also be considered as Obstructing Justice by a Federal Judge.

Despite the Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit and the illegal dismissal of the motion; Judge Sunderland still proceeded as planed under Arbitrary Jurisdiction and held his Kangaroo Court anyway.

KANGAROO COURT;
n. 1) a mock court set up without legal basis, slang for a court of law in which the violations of procedure, precedents, and due process are so gross that fundamental justice is denied. It usually means that the judge is incompetent or obviously biased.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS_100419p

Facts of the Case – Deprevation of Rights / Conspiracy against Rights

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242: This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.

Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

Attached to the e-mail is a time line and Facts of the Case (see attached document: FBI_Mueller_Facts-of-Case_111026.pdf).  This document will give you in more detail of the players, the facts, the cover-ups, and the Deprivation of Rights and Conspiracy against Rights that we are dealing with.

I have also been given information that another Federal Civil Rights Crime is about to be committed against me sometime next week.  This criminal act also involves “Federal Civil Rights Statutes; Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law and Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241, Conspiracy Against Rights” in a direct spinoff from the case we are dealing with now.

If you have anyone competent in you arsenal of personal, please send them over to prevent this criminal act before it is committed.  I really don’t have the clout to take over the government’s responsibilities, my only weapon is transparency which usually causes these people to scramble and make up more lies.

You may need to send someone from DC, I don’t believe there is anyone in Cincinnati that can handle this job.

Sincerely,
Stephen R. Lilley

 FBI_Mueller_Facts-of-Case_111026

Government Abuse (FBI, DOJ, Human Rights Abuse, Torture)


Sent to: Robert S. Mueller (Director, FBI)
Cc: Kevin L. Perkins (Assistant Director, FBI)

Dear Director Mueller,

On August 3, 2011, I filed a complaint with the DOJ Criminal Division, Chief Teresa McHenery on “GOVERNMENT ABUSE, DEPRIVATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, TORTURE (U.S.C. TITLE 18, § 2340) (ARTICLE 3 & 5 UDHR)”.  This is the same complaint that I am now filing with you, (see attached document: COMPLAINT-Government Abuse_FBI-Mueller_111025.pdf).

After more than five weeks and no response, on September 14, 2011, I sent Chief Teresa McHenery a follow up letter, (see attached document: Chief Teresa McHenry_110914.pdf).

On September 23, 2011, Chief Teresa McHerery replied to the complaint that I filed on August 3, 2011,  (see attached document: DOJ-Crinimal-Div_Tereasa-McHenry_reply.pdf)

As you can see; the response from the Human Rights  and Special Prosecutions Section had stated that they only prosecute Federal Criminal Violations including Torture when they are committed outside the United States.  To file a complaint to investigate within the borders of the United States I would need to file this complaint with my local FBI Office (along with the contact information).

As you are aware from my previous letters, the FBI Cincinnati field office will not get involved in this case.  Most likely if I did file this complaint with the Cincinnati Office, it would end up like all the other documents that I filed with them, “stuck in a little brown folder and forgot about.  Actually, It is probably a very big brown folder by now.

This is the reason that I am filing this complaint with you; to make sure this complaint is given to competent and responsible hands.  It appear that your Cincinnati field office has a problem with accepting their responsibility in protecting the public from government tyranny.

Due to government abuse, I have spent several days in the hospital, sent to the ER for what was believe to be a heart attack, and now disabled and unable to work, all to cover-up the theft of a quarter million by judicial officers.

Please see that this complaint is properly, responsibility, competently, and diligently addressed.

Sincerely,

Stephen R. Lilley

 COMPLAINT-Government Abuse_FBI-Mueller_111025p; Chief Teresa McHenry_110914; DOJ-Crinimal-Div_Tereasa-McHenry_reply

Chief Jack Smith (DOJ, Criminal Division, Public Ingegrety Section) – Color of Law


Sent to: Chief Jack Smith (USDOJ, Criminal Division, Public Integrity Section)

Dear Mr. Smith,

In a letter I receive from FBI Assistant Director Kevin L. Perkins responding to a letter I sent to FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III; Mr. Perkins and I were able to clear up several misunderstood issues.

I had filed several complaints with the FBI and other DOJ agencies relating to Color of Law Abuse; matters which apply to individual actions under his/her authority granted by state government which such acts were done outside the boundaries of his/her lawful authority.

Mr. Perkins had confirmed in his letter that the FBI does have investigative jurisdiction over my Federal Civil Rights Statutes complaints, stating “The FBI’s investigative jurisdiction, as it relates to Color of Law matters, applies to any individual action under his/her authority granted by the federal, state or local government, and when such acts are done outside the boundaries of the person’s lawful authority.”

Assistant Director Perkins and I had also cleared up a couple of other misunderstandings; Mr. Perkins assumed that the Color of Law Abuse complaint contained the allocations of embezzlement of nearly $250,000 by judicial officers. The embezzled quarter million by state officers took place several years earlier and was not a part of the complaints filed under Federal Civil Rights Statutes.

Mr. Perkins and I had also brought to the surface on the issue of seized property by law enforcement officers, this issue had never existed at all and I have no clue how it ever got into my files. This case is very complicated and quite intensive, without inside knowledge it would be very easy for an outsider to misunderstand or misapply the accusations in this case.

See attached letter to: Director Robert S. Mueller III

 FBI_Mueller_111019-Reply to Oct-14-2011;  COMPLAINT_18usc-1_Robert-S-Mueller_111021p;  COMPLAINT_18usc-2_Robert-S-Mueller_111021p

%d bloggers like this: